Contact Us ·  About Us ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Grand Island  ·   HDTV  ·   My TV  ·   Community  ·   Program Schedule  ·   Calendar
Agriculture/Business · As Seen On TV · Automotive · CBS · Classifieds · Contests · Jobs · Lottery · Restaurants · Find A Page
Hot Button
Lincoln SkyView
Powerball jackpot* for 10/15/2008 is
$25 Million
Find A Local Business
 
On Demand

On Demand

Plan to Protect Beetles Unpopular in Lincoln Save Email Print
Lincoln, Neb.
Posted: 11:06 AM Jul 2, 2008
Last Updated: 11:06 AM Jul 2, 2008
Reporter: AP and 10/11 News
Email Address: desk@kolnkgin.com

A | A | A

The federal government's proposal to set aside nearly 1,800 acres for the endangered Salt Creek tiger beetle proved unpopular at a public hearing.

Everyone who testified at Tuesday's meeting in Lincoln criticized the plan to set aside land in Lancaster and Saunders counties for the beetle's habitat.

“There's many reasons why a Wetlands can benefit society, but I have yet to have anybody explain to me how 260 Tiger Beetles are going to help our kids in the future, lower the debt, or provide jobs,” said Joe Hampton, Hampton Enterprises.

“I think it's a big waste of the public’s resources. Do we not have any higher priorities than trying to save 260 Beetles? How many jobs will it provide? How many taxes will it pay? What will it do for the overall economy? The only thing I can conclude is that it will increase an ever-increasing governmental debt, which our kids are going to have to pay,” Hampton said.

The half-inch-long Salt Creek tiger beetle is considered one of the rarest insects in the United States. It was listed as endangered in October 2005. It is metallic brown to dark-olive green and lives in rare saline wetlands found in eastern Nebraska.

“What happens then is that the Federal government will provide funding toward research on the habitat variables and that will help us learn how we can we manage those Saline Wetlands better for the benefit of the beetle ultimately to hopefully recover the insect,” said Robert Harms, biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Loss of saline wetland and stream habitats and changes in hydrology are blamed for the decline of the species.

Surveys done last year showed a total population of 263 beetles.

More Stories
Economy Fueling Early Christmas

Improvements At The Pump

Two LPD Officers Assaulted

Lincoln Resident Stabbed at Party

Omaha Man Accused of Shooting Brother

Lincoln Man Gets Seven Months for Road Rage Incident

Hints of Victory Creep into Obama's Remarks

McCain Shies Away From Recent Days' Attacks

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Craig Location: LINCOLN on Jul 4, 2008 at 07:12 AM
John and George are dead so I think it is of the upmost importance to protect the other two.

Posted by: Burrowing Owls on Jul 3, 2008 at 01:21 PM
Just bring in a few burrowing owls, and watch their kind treatment of these beetles.

Posted by: bill Location: South Lincoln on Jul 3, 2008 at 09:34 AM
It isn't just beetles it is land that will be for everyone always. To show what was once the norm for Nebraska. 1800 ac that a big farmer can't rip every stick and tree off of to get another bu of 7.00 corn. Or sink a well that sucks 1000g/min to pump on that corn. I am not a left wing tree hugg'n granola person either.

Posted by: Ray Location: lincoln on Jul 3, 2008 at 09:27 AM
I would rather save beetles then some of the insects HHS is supporting and look at thier cost to the tax payers.

Posted by: NOBODY Location: SEWARD on Jul 2, 2008 at 10:41 PM
Who and how did they count these beetles? How much area did they conduct their count in? I would challenge the number and the method. What a waste of money.

Posted by: md Location: lincoln,ne on Jul 2, 2008 at 10:40 PM
As always I'm glad to see a healthy discussion on the importance of an endangered species has deteriorated into schizobabble about dinosaurs. Anonymous, next time you want to make a point, try not to sound so crazy doing it. I agree with you though Ruthie, maybe not about the cure for cancer but these beetles are likely an integral part of this ecosystem and by taking away their home we could say, be allowing another insect to thrive-which would in turn cause more birds to come to the area and I am sure I would see anonymous on here complaining about the bird poop on their front lawn, next. So really-what's the harm in letting this little guys have a home? Seems to me they were here first, and what right do I have to take that away?

Posted by: Chrissy Location: Lincoln on Jul 2, 2008 at 06:52 PM
"Loss of saline wetland and stream habitats... are blamed for the decline of the species." It doesn't sound to me like this is a "NATURAL PROCESS." If humans maintain their current selfish and deserving attitudes and actions towards the loss of entire rare earthly habitats and endangered species, then I think at some point the governmental debt is going to be the least of our problems.

Posted by: Anonymous Location: Lincoln on Jul 2, 2008 at 04:24 PM
Well as Se said, it is just a natural process. The dinosaurs died out, the dodo, and many others before humans had an effect. I mean, if you're really so concerned about animals that are so close to extinction or are already there, lets go Jurassic Park and start trying to bring the dinosaurs back to give them another fighting chance right...It's about the animals right Ruthie, I mean, maybe dinosaurs have a cure for cancer... I wish we could individually choose exactly what our tax money went towards so not everyone, only the ones who "care" have to pay for junk expenses like this.

Posted by: Andrew Location: Lincoln on Jul 2, 2008 at 03:13 PM
Beetles have feelings too!

Posted by: Ruthie Location: Lincoln on Jul 2, 2008 at 03:04 PM
Lets just let a RARE BEETLE die off??? Are you kidding me? Lets just stop trying to save the Planet why we are at it. Who cares??? Right. Wrong... I care and so do many others. (where do these people come from) Let me help you out.... What they are looking for here is to Preserve what we have now for tomarrow. You never know down the line this RARE BEETLE could be connected to a cure for Disease or something. Thank God for the many people who care out there, what type of world would we have without people who cared

Posted by: Se Location: Beatrice on Jul 2, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Why spend money on trying to save an insect? So what if they become extinct, it happened to the dinosaurs, its a natural process. Sometimes humans need to leave things alone and let nature take its course. Look what has happened with the deer population! Now the concern isn't how few, but how many and the dollars being spent on insurance from collisions with them!!

Posted by: Don on Jul 2, 2008 at 12:51 PM
I think the beetles are neat and we should save the beetles. How about if I don't like bald eagles (but I do) and said we should let them all die. Everybody would get upset, but yet you all don't care to save a rare beetle. You all should help to save the beetle, maybe it has a specific reason to be on this earth.

Posted by: Bob Location: Lincoln on Jul 2, 2008 at 11:50 AM
How many taxpayers dollars is being wasted on this subject. We don't need the tree huggers around the bettles.

What's On KOLN/KGIN
CarStar
National News Video-AP