Contact Us ·  About Us ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Grand Island  ·   HDTV  ·   My TV  ·   Community  ·   Program Schedule  ·   Calendar  ·   2008 Election
Agriculture/Business · As Seen On TV · CarSoup · CBS · Classifieds · Contests · Jobs · Lottery · Restaurants · School Closings · Find A Page
Hot Button
On Demand

School Closings 10/11 Mobile Site RSS Feeds CBS Episodes Web Alert E-News Job SearchOn Demand

Lincoln SkyView
Powerball jackpot* for 1/10/2009 is
$120 Million
Council Rejects Horse Ordinance, 'Peter Rabbit' to Leave Town Save Email Print
Hickman, Neb.
Posted: 9:53 PM Aug 26, 2008
Last Updated: 9:55 AM Aug 27, 2008
Reporter: Chie Saito
Email Address: chie.saito@kolnkgin.com

A | A | A

A town outside of Lincoln is reconsidering its ban on horses within city limits. The controversy surrounds a 32-year-old horse named Peter Rabbit who currently lives within Hickman's city limits.

City officials say they have received thousands of letters, e-mails and phone calls in favor of keeping the horse at his current home. They say roughly 98 percent of the calls and letters they received came from people who live outside the state, or even as far away as Australia.

On Tuesday, the Hickman City Council voted two to four against passing a city ordinance which would have allowed horses within city limits.

If you drive down south 68th Street in Hickman, you will notice a peculiar sign which sums up one side of the issue in three simple words. "Save the Horse."

Kari Jones lives across the street from Peter Rabbit, the horse. His owner gave him the name because of his ability to hop around during his younger years.

"It's kinda nice. I grew up on a farm, so it's nice to have him around," Jones said. "I understand in a city you don't want animals or people to have chickens. I think they should make an exception."

But regardless of how residents like Jones may feel, the City said his owner is breaking a city municipal code.

The code bans all livestock within city limits.

According to Council President Doug Hanson, the process has been difficult.

"It's been really frustrating, because how do you weigh the benefits of serving one person and meeting the needs of a larger number? How do we do a special interest exception. Do we look at other ordinances and say I guess those aren't important either," said Hickman.

Hanson said Peter Rabbits fate may simply be a cost of growth in Hickman.

"We're trying to recruit and attract businessses and retail services. Does a pasture ground in the middle of town promote that. I'm not so sure," Hanson said.

But for Peter Rabbit's owners, it's a price they're not willing to pay.

We spoke to the landowner, Jack Scott whose father owns Peter Rabbit.

He feels the horse should be grandfathered in because its been there so long.

Now that the ordinance has failed, the Scotts have until Sept. 15 to comply with the City's Municipal Code.

But the Scotts say they're going to keep on fighting.

More Stories
Business Owner Arrested for Theft

Buffet's Boots to Raise Funds for Research

70 Laid Off at Nebraska Trailer Plant

Charge Refiled Against Mom of Suffocated Baby

New Year's Resolutions: Volunteering

Historic Day For Nebraska Legislature

Discussion of Nebraska's Mountain Lion Population Continues

Workshops Attempt To Answer Questions Surrounding VeraSun Bankruptcy

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Corbet Location: Bryan, Texas on Sep 23, 2008 at 10:38 PM
If they allow asses on the city council, surely one horse, in a pasture, should be no problem.

Posted by: Tricia Location: Florida on Sep 11, 2008 at 10:06 PM
God we had a horse like that in Tampa on Swann Avenue/MacDill in the 1970s, grandfathered in, it used to get loose and wander the city streets and show up at the dry cleaners. That horse got ancient, and no one made him leave, he didn't even have pasture, just a paddock behind a business on the street. He eventually died of old age. I grew up seeing that horse every week, I looked forward to it because it was the only horse nearby in the city. How sad that people can't respect and appreciate this animal in his senior years. Have some foresight people, have some respect. And yes, grandfather that animal in. What's he got, two years left? Leave him in peace where he is. And shame on the people who want to move him. Evolve. We have horses all over our county because it is shared county/city. I love seeing the horses even though we're not out in the country. People need to expand their minds and practice tolerance and come up with positive solutions. It's about compassion and cooperation.

Posted by: Larry Location: Lodi, CA on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:52 PM
If Peter Rabbit goes, the circle flies will have to move over to city hall.

Posted by: Susan Location: Saratoga Springs NY on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:27 PM
This is all about corporate greed and politics vs. traditional American community values. This from the article sums it up: "Hanson said Peter Rabbits fate may simply be a cost of growth in Hickman. "We're trying to recruit and attract businessses and retail services. Does a pasture ground in the middle of town promote that. I'm not so sure," Hanson said. What they gain in payoffs from developers, they will lose in tourism and public image. When will these small towns get it, there is a monetary and social value in the traditional uses of land, including farming? Will another Burger King make kicking Peter Rabbit out right? Will the ribbon cutting ceremonies with smiling politicians for the fast food joints and forgettable chain stores buy back the soul of the place? Hickman is 'Stuck on stupid,' as Gen'l Schwartzkopf used to say, and it might be mean spirited, too.

Posted by: Cindy Location: Lincoln on Aug 30, 2008 at 03:18 PM
Leave the poor horse alone. That is home for Peter Rabbit and he probably won't be around to many more years so let him live them out happy. The horse was there before anyone else and they all knew he was there before they bought in the area. There is real live horses living in Lincoln, Ne right in town with houses closer than what they are talking about in Hickman. I would think Lincoln would have a lot more pull then the little town of Hickman, Ne

Posted by: Don on Aug 30, 2008 at 10:07 AM
They should grandfather Peter in as he has been there. It's not like they just put him there. In the city of Lincoln you can have chickens in a fence. That is almost like livestock. Why can't the town come to some kind of ageement to leave it alone. Like it has been noted this horse don't have to long of a life left so he won't be there to many more years. I wonder if it would even live another year let alone cause this problem over a peaceful animal. Does the horse sell drugs to kids? Go speeding down city streets in its car? Steal stuff from peoples garages? It obeys all laws execpt being outside of city limits, but it was outside city limits untill just recently. Leave him alone.

Posted by: Vicki B. Atz Location: Houston on Aug 28, 2008 at 01:56 PM
Let Peter stay and allow him to live the rest of his life is the surroudings he knows as home. What harm is he doing ? Shouldn't all this energy be put into issues of importance. Maybe there is a grandfather law to protect Peter. Shame on those being so mean and petty !!!Concerned, Vicki Atz

Posted by: MEME on Aug 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM
Why in the world does the city councils of this state want to cause problems. If something is not broke why do they have to try and fix it. They seem to be picking on the young and old residents who own animals that have done nothing wrong. Why don't they look into the ones causeing problems such as the drunk drivers and the ones attempting to harm the children with assults and drugs. Perhaps picking on the not so well to do, makes them feel more in control. So sad we have these type trying to run the cities in NE.

Posted by: small town ne Location: central nebraska on Aug 27, 2008 at 02:42 PM
congrats this story made MSN to bad they don't have any other issues in that town to worry

Posted by: sinead Location: Dublin, Ireland on Aug 27, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Somebody save this horse from a sure death!! If he is moved at such an old age and having been in the same place for so long he will surely die. The council of Hickman should be ashamed of themselves. All of my family and friends all agree that if they can treat an old man and his horse this way in a small city in the US, we certainly will not be venturing to the US anytime soon. Save Peter Rabitt!!!

Posted by: Del Location: Lincoln on Aug 27, 2008 at 02:16 PM
This is so ridiculious. so you want to live in a small town because of it's benefits, yeah right--many large cities in the US allow large animals in the city limits and no problem-then you get a small town and they want to run everyone in the town. Maybe these small minded council members can next pass a law against small town gossip and enforce it, because apparently that is all they have on their plate.

Posted by: Deb Location: Kearney, NE on Aug 27, 2008 at 01:47 PM
In this day and age, where there seem to be more and more animal cruelty stories everyday, how would new businesses that might entertain moving into Hickman feel about the cruelty of moving this old horse from the only home he has ever known. I assume that many would be happy to wait out the remainder of time that poor old horse has left to allow him to enjoy his final days where he is comfortable. Maybe they should reconsider moving to Hickman at all, if the City Council is going to be so difficult to deal with. I would be curious to see if they have ever Grandfathered anything in, and what it might be, bet it might shed a little more light on this subject!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 27, 2008 at 01:04 PM
I thought the owner of the property asked Hickman to annex his land. They did and now he still wants his horse. He can't go back after it's been annexed.

Posted by: Julie Location: Lincoln on Aug 27, 2008 at 12:59 PM
I seriouly hope people think long and hard before spending a penny in the LITTLE town of Hickman. This is downright shameful. Leave the poor horse alone! Afterall, he's 32 years old. It's not like he'll be around forever. Poor Peter Rabbit! I feel for his family and anyone who has loved him. I hope the city (ha!) council eventually sees the long-term harm their shortsighted decision will cause this community.

Posted by: joey on Aug 27, 2008 at 11:39 AM
this is another example of wasting precious time with stupid issues. the horse is old, it might die soon. just leave it alone. concentrate on other issues.

Posted by: Holly Location: SE Nebraska on Aug 27, 2008 at 09:59 AM
I am sure that there are more pressing issues than whether a horse should be removed. That horse has been there longer than the council members have been in office. I say LET PETER STAY!

Posted by: Alan Location: Lincoln on Aug 27, 2008 at 08:20 AM
What a bunch of maroons. They didn't have to change the law to allow horses (or as one of the council members said - mules). All they had to do was grandfather one horse! And it is a huge stretch to consider it in the city limits (even though it may be) since it is out in the country. Their farm was swallowed up in an effort to get to the new construction North of town to include it in the city limits. Wise up Hickman council!

Posted by: Steph Location: Mississippi on Aug 27, 2008 at 08:04 AM
68th Street .. "center of town" .. Hickman must be very large. I live near Memphis, TN and when I'm at the 6800 block of Poplar Ave, I'm almost 10 miles from downtown. If that horse needs a home, I'll take it. I have 64 acres of rolling pasture in North Mississippi where it could spend it's remaining days. The mayor and council of Hickman are idiots .. Sad.

Posted by: Betty on Aug 27, 2008 at 07:42 AM
If people only knew that the only reason Jack Scott was fighting this was because he has issues with the current city council. When he was not re-elected a few years back, he got bitter. He has even said that if McDonalds wanted to build near by. "the horse would have to go"

Posted by: Observer Location: Lincoln on Aug 27, 2008 at 07:37 AM
The Scotts should quit insisting on having their own way and tearing the town apart in the process. I believe I read at some point about a veterinarian who was willing to stable the horse. Look at the alternatives that are available and play nice!

Posted by: Lori Location: eastern nebraska on Aug 27, 2008 at 06:55 AM
why on earth do they want him out of there....??? I think he should stay, if no one is complaining then so be it..... SAVE THE HORSE!!!

Posted by: Jesi Location: Hebron on Aug 27, 2008 at 02:05 AM
Well for one, i have been to Hickman and this horse is not 'in the middle of town' as is stated in the article. To me, if the horse is not harming anyone and not getting loose and eating the neighbors flowers why bother him? He's 32 years old. Chances are the horse will not live much longer since most horses life expectance is only 30 years. I say let the horse stay.

What's On KOLN/KGIN
CarStar
National News Video-AP