Contact Us ·  About Us ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Grand Island  ·   HDTV  ·   My TV  ·   Community  ·   Program Schedule  ·   Calendar  ·   2008 Election
Agriculture/Business · As Seen On TV · CarSoup · CBS · Classifieds · Contests · Jobs · Lottery · Restaurants · School Closings · Find A Page
Hot Button
On Demand

School Closings 10/11 Mobile Site RSS Feeds CBS Episodes Web Alert E-News Job SearchOn Demand

Lincoln SkyView
Evicting Peter Rabbit the Horse Save Email Print
Posted: 9:07 PM Sep 15, 2008
Last Updated: 11:03 PM Sep 15, 2008
Reporter: Jason Volentine
Email Address: jason.volentine@kolnkgin.com

A | A | A

Nebraska's most famous horse is officially an outlaw.

Peter rabbit is a horse being kept in Hickman city limits against the municipal code. 30 days ago, city officials notified Peter Rabbit's owners that the horse had to go, but he's still there and it's creating quite a controversy.

The City of Hickman has become overwhelmed with e-mails, calls and letters from horse lovers all over the world. They want the 30-year-old horse, Peter Rabbit, to stay right where he is; inside city limits where he's been nearly his whole life.

The city says, "No way."

Call after call and e-mail after e-mail, the interest in Peter Rabbit, the horse being evicted from Hickman City limits, has drawn interest not only from across the nation but the world.

'Horses are very sympathetic characters," said Emily Bausch, the Hickman utility and codes director. "Some people are kind of rude, cuss at us, call us names," she said of the calls they receive from people angered at the city for it's plans to evict Peter Rabbit.

It's all because of a 20-year-old city ordinance that says "nay" to livestock living in the city limits.

Last year, the city told the horse's owner, Harley Scott, that the horse had to go.

"He wanted the city to let him stay and just leave it alone. We tried to negotiate with him on annual vet certificates, but that failed," said Hickman City Administrator Brett Baker.

Finally, city officials gave the Scotts 30 days to move the horse saying Peter Rabbit had to be out by September,15.

"They're going to be cited. There will be a citation issued for every day they're not in compliance," said Baker.

The Scotts weren't around for comment but have told city officials in the past they refuse to move the horse because it was on the land, before the land was part of the city. Either way, the $100 dollar fines start Monday and the horse is still in the barn.

"The city attorney as made the decision that grandfathering does not exist, that's why he's out of compliance," said Baker.

However, even the rule of law hasn't stopped the mountain of horse lovers from protesting, and it's the city of Hickman learning the power of Peter Rabbit.

"To have one issue dominate a majority of our time... it's a huge change," said Bausch.

"We have a new respect for the power of the internet and the power of the media because this thing has really garnered some national attention and nationwide sympathy," said Baker.

Another angle to this story involves the property on which Peter Rabbit lives. The property is in city limits only because the owner, Jack Scott, related to Peter Rabbit's owner Harley Scott, asked for it to be voluntarily annexed almost two years ago.

Another unique twist to the case; Jack Scott sat on the city council 20 years ago and supported the ordinance prohibiting livestock in city limits.

The Scotts now have a lawyer who's told city officials, as well as media sources, that they will litigate this to the highest possible court.

More Stories
Property Tax Shift Proposed

Lethal Injection Bill Outlined

Business Owner Arrested for Theft

Buffet's Boots to Raise Funds for Research

70 Laid Off at Nebraska Trailer Plant

Charge Refiled Against Mom of Suffocated Baby

New Year's Resolutions: Volunteering

Historic Day For Nebraska Legislature

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Marsha Hayley Location: Bixby, OK on Oct 13, 2008 at 11:09 AM
I have lived in small towns and large cities and I know how small towns on the fringes of the cities love it when the city starts to grow in their direction. When that happens you can expect common decency and caring to go right out the window. All that is cared about then is how fast the community can start kissing the developers butts with their demands on getting rid of existing homes, businesses, vacant lots, or even animals on property that the developers wish to have. This horse is a family pet, he isn't and hasn't been what farmers would consider livestock for a long time if he ever was. And for folks coming to the so called bedroom communities, they need to get a dose of reality that if they want the small town atmosphere they need to leave the town as they find it and not try to make it a replica of what they are trying to escape from. Americans love a cause to support and Hickman has given them one. Peter Rabbit deserves to be allowed to finish his life in his pasture.

Posted by: Brenda Location: CT on Oct 12, 2008 at 05:19 AM
At first I thought: If this is the greatest issue facing Hickman, then that is where I want to live. Then again, who would want to live in a place that lacks compassion and common sense? Leave Peter Rabbit grazing. For those who find Peter all that offensive, move to an urban area where folks live daily with violent crime, poverty, hunger, drugs, etc. At least you won't have to worry about seeing Peter Rabbit grazing through his last days.

Posted by: Tina Swyers Location: Independence, Kansas on Oct 5, 2008 at 02:47 PM
Keep the horse where he has lived. It is unbelieveable that some people can be so uncaring about a horse that is 30 years old. The town of Hickman will be remembered for caring enough about the horse rather than their law. Grandfather Peter Rabbit in!

Posted by: Dawn Location: Carson City, NV on Oct 1, 2008 at 04:49 PM
I am from a similar area. The horse should be left there. If I had to hazard a guess, I would bet this started coming to a head when some yuppie wannabe with connections started complaining about the eau de manure that came their way when the wind shifted. If this IS the case, the horse was there first and they knew it when they purchased. Quit picking on the elderly (horse and owners). I mean honestly, how much longer could the horse possibly live? Peter is already ancient by most equine standards I know.

Posted by: Lin Location: CA on Sep 24, 2008 at 11:03 PM
That lawyer who said grandfathering doesn't exist has to be exceedingly stupid! Right along with the mayor...what a pair!

Posted by: Colleen Location: New York City on Sep 22, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Why are people so cold and hard and selfish that they can't allow an old horse to live out his days in peace where he belongs? Why are you willing to show such disrespect to an elderly resident? How do I make a contribution to the Peter Rabbit legal defense fund?

Posted by: Di Location: Minnesota on Sep 18, 2008 at 12:49 PM
The Peter Rabbit did not have anything to do with your laws. He was there before they were passed. Grand father him in. He is so old he should be allowed to live the remainder of his life in his home. To move him at his age is selfish and inhumane.

Posted by: Kathy Location: Ohio on Sep 17, 2008 at 11:03 AM
The equine community has given the city of Hickman, along with it's officials, a bad taste! Moving Peter Rabbit would be like giving him a death sentence. How much longer can he live? I haven't heard any 'news' about how the horse is bothering anyone. He looks healthy, especially for his age. Just because the people may be jerks and didn't realize he would have to go when they annexed, that's no reason to take anger out on a 30-year-old horse! Please...is there no compassion in the Hickman government.

Posted by: small town on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:32 PM
This is a small town leave him there...Other small towns have horses and chickens and all kinds of animals living in town..Wymore Does and they run all over if we are gonna clean up one small town clean them all up...

Posted by: horsey Location: lincoln on Sep 16, 2008 at 03:32 PM
grandfather the animal. he is old and won't be here that long.

Posted by: Mike Location: HIckman on Sep 16, 2008 at 01:24 PM
I want to thank the city council for standing up for what is right. The Scotts needed to either stay out of the city limits (not asking for annexation) or get rid of the horse. They can't have it both ways! They are profiting by having their development in the city but feel they are above the law. They are an embarassment to Hickman - the town they used to support and work to make a better place to live.

Posted by: Bones Location: Nebraska on Sep 16, 2008 at 12:23 PM
In principle the law is the law. Unfortunately for Peter Rabbit the village leaders of Hickman are chosing principle over reason. My past experience with elected officials and government would support that this is more than just principle. Here's an ultimatum to the Hickman Village leaders; submit a legitiment reason for evicting the Rabbit [i.e. negatively affecting Hickman]. Otherwise Grandfather the horse and stop wasting the money of the tax payers!

Posted by: Lori Location: Lincoln on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:42 AM
I'm sorry but the city of Hickman needs to include a clause in their ordinance that allows Peter Rabbit to remain in his pasture.I drive east down HiWay 2 here in Lincoln & their are horses between Hiway 2 & Walmart.

Posted by: Christy Location: Lincoln on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Definition of Live-Stock: n.Domestic animals kept for use on a farm and raised for sale or profit. Definition of Pet: n. an animal that is tamed or domesticated and kept as a companion or treated with fondness. It's pretty clear what category "Peter Rabbit" falls under. HE'S A PET!!!!

Posted by: wendy green Location: nc on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:29 AM
where can i send money to help with the fines ? i have friends who want to help pay the fines too.

Posted by: Rhonda Location: Cozad on Sep 16, 2008 at 06:49 AM
Peter Rabbit should be allowed to stay where he is. The town needs to get a grip and get a life. Why worry about a horse. There are more important things to worry about than an innocent horse.

Posted by: Hickman Res Location: Hickman on Sep 15, 2008 at 10:48 PM
This is probably the best article that I have seen from the media since this all started. You used Facts, and one's from the other side of the story. Thank You KOLN!

Posted by: Hose lover Location: Genoa Ne on Sep 15, 2008 at 10:08 PM
The City of Hickman dont need to worry about horses in the city limit, they need to worry bout the junk vechial and trash around the city limit, they need to take care of the empty houses. PEOPLE JUST NEED TO LIVE THE HORSE ALONE, HE HAS BEEN LIVING THERE THE REST OF HIS LIFE HE HAS BEEN THERE FOR 20YEAR OF HIS LIFE, JUST LEAVE THE HORSE ALONG

What's On KOLN/KGIN
CarStar
National News Video-AP