Contact Us ·  About Us ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Grand Island  ·   HDTV  ·   My TV  ·   Community  ·   Program Schedule  ·   Calendar
Ag/Business · Anchor Trips · CBSNews.com · Contests · E-news · Find A Page · Healthy Everyday · Lottery · News Dubs · GO GREEN
Search for gas prices by US Zip Code
Find A Local Business
 
Gasoline Prices.
New Rules for Pit Bulls Could Be in Place Soon Save Email Print
Lincoln, Neb.
Posted: 5:16 PM Aug 4, 2008
Last Updated: 5:16 PM Aug 4, 2008
Reporter: WOWT News
Email Address: desk@kolnkgin.com

Charlotte Blevins was attacked by a pit bull in June.

A | A | A

Omaha will likely have a plan in place for the mayor by the end of the month concerning new rules regulating pit bulls or other breeds.

That's when the Nebraska Humane Society believes the work of a committee may wrap up and then that plan would go before the public and City Council.

Omaha has 1,500 licensed pit bulls, but experts believe there are another 4,500 that aren't licensed. Would a ban like the one Council Bluffs has on the breed make any difference to those who aren't following the rules anyway?

We're just five weeks removed from the terrifying wagon ride that 16-month-old Charlotte Blevins took through her neighborhood at 13th and Pine. A pit bull broke free from its cloth leash and attacked. The toddler lost part of her scalp.

“There are too many irresponsible owners,” said Charlotte’s mother, Wendy Blevins. The pit bull bit her, too.

"All the laws and ordinances in place say the dog needed a leash. It had one. It needed its shots. It had them. This woman followed all the laws in place and this dog still took down four people and nearly killed two children," she said.

"Nothing is off the table,” said Mark Langan with the Nebraska Humane Society, which made it clear Monday that all possibilities still exist.

The committee, made up of the Humane Society and city officials, is considering everything from pit bull bans to new rules for specific dogs and their owners to new rules for all dogs or some combination.

The bottom line is public safety.

"To identify dogs before they bite, to give them the label of potentially dangerous dogs,” Langan said.

And how do you do that? "By using certain criteria we're not ready to talk about yet, but things for owners to abide by before it escalates to a bite situation," Langan said.

Council Bluffs started a pit bull ban three years ago, meaning no new pit bulls were allowed and existing ones had to register, get a microchip, get spayed or neutered and the owner needed insurance.

There hasn't been a pit bull bite reported in Council Bluffs since the ban went into effect.

Could what Council Bluffs did work in a larger city like Omaha?

"I believe yes, but it would be based on the verbiage of the ordinance,” said Council Bluffs animal control officer Galen Barrett.

Langan, while complementary of Council Bluffs’ success, isn't sure Omaha could copy that with the same success. Council Bluffs has 160 registered pit bulls, Omaha has 1,500.

More Stories
Palin's Visit to Omaha Receives Cheers; Criticism

Police Say Kentucky Woman Kills Self, Daughters

Sen. Chuck Hagel's Wife to Endorse Obama

Better Ventilation May Lower SIDS Risk

Sharp Words Exchanged on Campaign Trail

Nebraska Classrooms Reflect Hispanic Population Growth

Man In Court For Animal Abuse Case

Researchers say Better Ventilation may Lower SIDS Risk

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous Location: Lincoln on Aug 9, 2008 at 05:49 PM
pit bulls should NOT be banned. as some people have already stated, it's the person NOT the dog. a dog acts out if it has no proper discipline. ANY dog has the potential to be dangerous, even my little 7 pound maltese, although she wouldn't hurt a fly, she could easily, seriously injure a small child, if she never had propper discipline. pitbulls are not mean by default, i've seen pitbulls that have only one dangerous thing on them: their tails from wagging too much because they're so happy to see you. i feel bad for anyone who has ever had a traumatic encounter with a pit bull, but people have to be smart enough to know that it's the owners fault for not raising it correctly, and the owner should have consequences, not the dog.

Posted by: Don on Aug 7, 2008 at 12:34 PM
It's about time!!!!!!!!!!! These dogs should have been banned years ago. You say its bad owners. I knew a family trained their dog, feed and watered the dog and took good care of their dog. One day it just broke its chain and went after somebody and the dog was put to sleep after that by the family (not by cops or others) and they swore never to get a pit bull again. Since then they have 2 labs and these are nice dogs and have never once tried to bite somebody and one dog is 10 years old now the other is 5 I think. So its not bad owners its this dogs temperment. It need to be out of our society as it is a dangerous breed of dog!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Trezure Location: Peterson on Aug 6, 2008 at 03:32 PM
I would like to know what should happen to the pit bulls who have never acted out and caused any danger? I have been attacked pretty bad by a lab, and I still love them. That one dog can't represent an entire breed. Mail carriers get bit by labs more than any other dog. Should we ban them? I don't think so. I think we hear about only the bad when it comes to pit bulls. As a true animal(all animals) lover I would never want a breed banned.

Posted by: jj on Aug 6, 2008 at 12:18 AM
Owners not the bread. Sad that most owners of this bread are getting them for the wrong reasons. If they only knew that the bread itself is sweet and loving and loyal. Yet the bad owners train them to protect and keep them outside and no socialization. Just sad that good people and good dogs have to suffer because a few. p.s my kids have been chased down by a golden retriver and bitten by those horrible little chihauhaus!

Posted by: Karen on Aug 5, 2008 at 09:51 PM
I am truly sorry that this has happened to Charlotte. But if you are going to make a ban on dogs by breed then lets do it fairly. Lets put in the ankle bitters and German Shepards, Labadors, and any other breed that has ever bit a person and you will see people changing there tune. Exspecially when they see there dogs breed as one of those who have bitten. Judge the deed and not the breed. Lets ban the irresponsible owners.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2008 at 06:37 PM
Hey GINA Use spell check next time. This is another example of the type of people who think Pit Bulls are "Sweet Dogs" Uneducated, selfish, and uncaring towards mankind!

Posted by: Gina Location: Genoa on Aug 5, 2008 at 04:31 PM
U NEED TO US UR BRAIN AND THINK THERE IS NOTHING WORNG WITH PIT BULLS IT THE PEOPLE THAT RAISING THEM, PEOPLE UP IN OMAHA ARE USING THEM AS A FIGHING DOG, I HAD ONE HE WAS A SWEET DOG WONT HURT NO ONE AND SOMEONE CAME ALONG AND KILLED HIM IN MY BACK YARD, THE STUFF ON YOU TUB ARE FIGHTING DOGS, OMG PEOPLE NEED TO GROW UP AND LEAVE THE DOGS ALONG, IM SORRY IT ATTACKE THE LITTLE GIRL,

Posted by: MACKADO Location: Lincoln on Aug 5, 2008 at 02:55 PM
My first encounter with Pit Bulls was in Florida. There, they were used to chase down wild boors. I never did see any of the owners walking their Pit Bulls, or trying to socialize them with people. These dogs were kept in pens, and the only time they were loose is too run down the boors. The man that owned the Pit Bulls, has been biten numerous times by his dogs, and told me, that the Pit Bull Breed, becomes very agaited, has a shorter memory recall than most dogs, and will go for your throat. The Military tried working with this breed, and so far it hasn't been too successful. Considering why the dog was breed, and it's record of biting, and attacking, I would think you could spend your money on another breed of dog, that will give you more pleasure. Even if we had 9 good behaved Pit Bulls, and one bad one, that's still too much, considing the damage they can do to kids, and Adults!! I will tell you this, I carry a can of pepper spray with me, and it's for BAD DOGS, and BAD PEOPLE!!

Posted by: Ban Pit Bulls! Location: Lincoln on Aug 5, 2008 at 11:27 AM
I hope a state wide ban of pit bulls is issued. Google pit bull attacks, check out u-tube, and get the statistics on how dangerous these dogs are regardless of how well the owners "train" them. They are still a violent breed.

Posted by: Doug Location: Omaha on Aug 5, 2008 at 09:27 AM
If they ban pitbulls they need to ban Labs too...a labrador puppy killed a child a couple weeks ago, but i dont hear anyone in a fit over banning labs, even tho 9 out of 10 bites per year are by labs and retrievers. people need to get there facts straight before they start crying. We need to enforce the laws we have instead of spending money starting new ones. I have 3 dogs(none of which are pitbulls) that are all over 50lbs, if we didnt train them or follow the laws in place its possible they could be dangerous, but they arent because we trained them and socialized them to people and children. My 110 lb BullMastif Boxer mix is the biggest baby in the world, my fiancees 6 year old daughter uses him like a jungle gym and he loves it. If the dogs were trained properly we wouldnt be having these problems. I myself have been attacked by 2 smaller dogs(american eskimo, shiba-inu)but i would never consider banning those breeds based on the attacks. CONDEM THE DEED, NOT THE BREED!!!!!

Posted by: mc on Aug 5, 2008 at 08:53 AM
I think that this ban is completly outrageous. I think that if your going to ban pit bulls you need to ban other breeds that are deemed dangerous as well. I'm really sick and tired of pit bulls getting all the bad rap. So lets put this ban in place and force people to just give up their pits or kill them. Why not just kill them so everyone can feel much safer what a grand idea. Seriously what's next, what are you going to try and control next?

Posted by: tracy a mackey Location: omaha on Aug 5, 2008 at 06:09 AM
They should be banned too many careless owners. They are very dangerous animals, regradless if they are on a lease. It's in there dna.

Posted by: dish Location: lincoln on Aug 5, 2008 at 12:20 AM
I live in Havelock. There is a woman who walks a pit bull on Havelock Ave, yes it has a leash, no I don't know if it has had its shots. The woman is unable to control the dog. It barks, snarls, and lunges at everyone it goes by. The days it lunged at me, I could feel its breath on my face, I was in side a doorway when it came at me. The dog has put several people against the brick. what did animal control and police say, was it on a leash, well we can't do anything. What does it take, what happened to the little girl in Omaha? Be proactive-Don't take your dog in public if you can't keep a hold of them!

Posted by: julia on Aug 5, 2008 at 12:19 AM
i think that the pitbull population definitely needs to be kept in check. they obviously have a reputation of attacking people without being provoked. this is a great idea.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 4, 2008 at 09:45 PM
How is little Charlotte doing? What became of the dog that attacked her and 3 other people?

Posted by: Momof3 Location: Lincoln on Aug 4, 2008 at 08:48 PM
FINALLY! Let's get these laws made before anyone else gets hurt. Can Lincoln do the same? A man was just attacked in Lincoln during a walk Friday evening. Something NEEDS to be done. SERIOUSLY!!

CarStar
What's On KOLN/KGIN