Contact Us ·  About Us ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Central Nebraska  ·   HDTV  ·   My TV  ·   Community  ·   Program Schedule  ·   Calendar
Ag/Business · Anchor Trips · CBSNews.com · Contests · E-news · Find A Page · Healthy Everyday · Lottery · News Dubs · GO GREEN
Search for gas prices by US Zip Code
Find A Local Business
 
Gasoline Prices.
Kleeb Campaigns in Omaha, Lincoln Save Email Print
Lincoln, Neb.
Posted: 5:44 PM Aug 5, 2008
Last Updated: 7:01 PM Aug 5, 2008
Reporter: Lance Schwartz
Email Address: lance.schwartz@kolnkgin.com

A | A | A

While Mike Johanns toured central Nebraska, his opponent was in the capital city.

Scott Kleeb spoke Tuesday afternoon at Southeast Community College, and the Democratic Senate nominee said Washington isn't doing enough to develop alternative sources of energy.

Kleeb didn't mind pointing fingers. He accused Johanns of misrepresenting his stance on drilling off American shores.

With the pain at the pump, Americans are feeling these days, he feels it's important to set the record straight.

Kleeb was front and center Tuesday afternoon, sharing with SCC students and faculty his thoughts on offshore drilling.

"My opponent has made a big deal about trying to say that I don't believe in drilling, and I do, it's part of the equation. There are right now 64 million acres of lands that oil companies have, but they're choosing not to drill in those areas. We've got to drill in those areas," he said.

Kleeb said drilling off American shores could offer short term relief, but he's looking for a long term fix.

"We've got to get back to alternative energies of all sorts, and this is where we've really had no leadership at all on this issue and we can," he said.

Kleeb said government leaders need to explore wind, solar, nuclear and biofuels to prepare for the future.

"You know we spend more in this country on developing new kinds of cat food or pet food in general than we do on developing new sources of energy? It's ridiculous. We've got to change the way we deal with energy policy and show some real leadership on this," he said.

If Kleeb is going to get the chance to make a difference, he's got a lot of work to do. The latest polls show Kleeb trailing his Republican opponent by 26 points, but the democratic candidate remains optimistic

"We've out raised my opponent. We're actually going up on TV this week, so the campaign's goin' great. We've still got a long way to go in this campaign season, and I like actually where we're sitting," Kleeb said.

Monday night at the Custer County Fair, Kleeb did beat Johanns. Unfortunately, for him, it was in a cow milking contest.

If Kleeb is going to get the chance to make a change, he has a lot of ground to make up in the next three months. Johanns is leading Kleeb by 26 points in the latest general election polling numbers.

But Kleeb does have the support of the Nebraska AFL-CIO. Kleeb was in Omaha Tuesday afternoon to accept the endorsement. The union represents more than 48,000 Nebraska workers.

More Stories
Galindo Appeals Death Sentence

Company Could Bring Hundreds of Jobs to Nebraska

Governor Disagrees with McCain on Ethanol Mandates

More Cattle in Nebraska Feedlots

Former Nebraska Deputies' Convictions Reversed

10 New West Nile Cases

Allegiant Takes Flight In Grand Island

Nebraska Farm Bureau Endorses Mike Johanns for U.S. Senate

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 14, 2008 at 07:49 PM
I made a comment once about the "bad" Iowa Republican Congressman Steve King from Western Iowa (perhaps I used a stronger term?). Now let me use the strongest positive terms. I may have mentioned that we had a great, moderate, independent-thinking, intelligent, far-seeing, honorable, knowledgeable, experienced (in economics and foreign policy) former Republican Congressman from eastern Iowa, named Jim Leach. He has now endorsed Obama. He said it was difficult, because it was like "leaving the family" since he had never endorsed a Democratic Presidential candidate before.I want to make it clear up front that this is a very honorable man, and he has a very major, prestigous academic position, and is old enough to retire from political life. It was even speculated that he did not try hard to win the last election. But he would not make a deal to endorse to get a job, that I am sure. Better if he had, because I want Obama, if he wins, to have both Leach and Hagel as his top advisers!

Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 11, 2008 at 09:23 AM
maybe the right-wing Andrew does not know any better. First of all Obama writes or at least edits, more recently, many of the speeches he gives with a teleprompter. Second, he has selected the great speechwriter Ted Sorensen to work with, so he has a very high standard for his speeches. Third, and most important, he held many town meetings in Iowa. I know, I heard him in two small towns in Southern Iowa. He had no teleprompter. He just spoke and then answered many intelligent questions from sincere, concerned, informed Iowa voters -- not the dirty-tricky questions from self-promoting, trivia-obsessed so-called reporters -- but questions normal people care about. 70% of Iowa Democrats at the caucuses did not vote for Hillary, and at county conventions Obama gained even more support. She would not have won in Iowa even if Edwards had not run in Iowa, because many Democrats here liked Biden and Richardson (and Hagel!) better than they liked Hillary. Not hype:fact, policy, solutions.

Posted by: Andrew Location: Lincoln on Aug 9, 2008 at 03:17 PM
Obama gets himself in trouble whenever he is not guided by the almighty teleprompter of course he doesn't want to debate. But these liberals sure love the hype of him don't they? You know, Hitler was charismatic too.

Posted by: The Good Andrew Location: Lincoln on Aug 9, 2008 at 12:47 AM
WOW! Andrew,you noticed a wrong letter in a word,pat yourself on the back for a job well done,great job,I am so happy your on the side that pays attention to whats important and happening in the U.S.,If you had noticed it has not been good.

Posted by: DSL Location: Nebraska on Aug 8, 2008 at 09:32 PM
Ben and Andrew, People like you have gotten us into this mess!! Unemployment, high fuel prices, a HUGE national debt, and seven percent of our population now control 90% of the wealth. What are you so afraid of?? We need change now! We can not take more of the same old politics which have produced this mess. I will vote against anyone who even slightly resembles Bush. Johanns is tied so closely to Bush that it scares me. He will not represent any of us including you two. He is too easily persuaded by big money. When will people look beyond lables and vote in their own best interest?

Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 8, 2008 at 07:30 PM
To Scott: The bad right-wing extremists who have taken over the Republican party are not traditional Republicans. Please do not call certain people "true Republicans" when they are untruthful Republicans. There are many good Republicans. I would list them, but I don't believe in short comments! Just kidding (partly)! I think that it actually puts good Republicans in danger of being targeted for defeat in primaries, when people on the far right find out which ones think for themselves instead of being ditto-heads. The punctuation most far right folks believe in is saying "ditto" to Rush and Fox and Bush and Cheney. To Jan: be careful in geting into back-and-forth with these right-wing types. There is no sense of civility underlying their supposedly proper grammar. Grammar is only a very superficial way of being polite. They are deeply disrespectful people toward those they don't like, and deeply devoted to their authoritatian leaders and role-models. Classic psychology!

Posted by: Ben Location: Lincoln on Aug 8, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Andrew, you sure are pulling the liberals out of the muck. They are in true form. They are all worried about grammar and spelling. The big picture is the issues at hand. Illegal immigration,energy prices,food prices,financial system,and taxes! When the Dem's are ready to have a real debate let us know. They will be just like Obama and will not show up for a small town debate. He can't answer real questions with real answers. I guess he can move all of you liberal by saying "CHANGE" Andrew, the liberals need "CHANGE" I suggest they change their under ware that will make them feel better!

Posted by: Andrew Location: Lincoln on Aug 8, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Jan I bet if you ask a professor he would tell you that you misspelled grammar too.

Posted by: Andrew Location: Lincoln on Aug 8, 2008 at 09:45 AM
Well you better be saving up your change now if you want some in your pocket durring the Obama years because when he socializes our healthcare he will raise taxes to do so. Have you been to Canada lately? Don't just believe what Michael Moore says, their helathcare system is in crisis and their taxes are outragous. They are looking at our healthcare system to adopt. You people with this "CHANGE" slogan need to look at the real facts.

Posted by: Jan Location: Lincoln on Aug 8, 2008 at 04:16 AM
Andrew,did you know that it's 2008 and Proper Grammer has changed in the last ten years,just ask any Professor.

Posted by: Ben Location: Lincoln on Aug 8, 2008 at 01:25 AM
Hey Andrew, you know Scott he will vote for Obama because he wants change. Thats what he will have in his pocket and the rest of America if Obama is elected. Kleeb and Obama doesn't stand a chance. Remember Kleeb tried this once all ready and lost. He will again!

Posted by: Andrew Location: Lincoln on Aug 7, 2008 at 09:35 AM
First of all "It isn't ANYTHING to brag about" would be correct grammar, but you are an intelligent democrat so you knew that right? Second, that is all I need to say because Kleeb does not stand a chance.

Posted by: scott Location: Lincoln on Aug 7, 2008 at 01:41 AM
Hey Andrew,is that all you can say? cause you give the same answer for everything you reply to,Your a true Republican which isn't nothing to brag about.

Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 6, 2008 at 07:10 PM
New nuclear facilities in the U. S. won't be the only ones. There will be new ones all over the world, with threat of more nuclear materials available for terrorist attacks and theft. There will be waste that will be dangerous for ages, and nowhere safe to store it. There will be restrictions on civil liberties in order to protect the nuclear plants, or else they won't be adequately protected! Development immediately of clean solar, wind, and geo-thermal, which can be done if Republicans permit us to do so, could be a major source of U. S. jobs, of local control (rather than big corporate monopolies) and could produce technology to export throughout the world, reducing both the threats of dirty coal plants and of risky nuclear plants. All countries could prosper, with clean energy, and without danger! Europe and California live well, using less energy than most of the U. S. Greed, stupidity, wastefulness, big oil $ in politics, and Republicans, block the way. Get out of the way!

Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 6, 2008 at 06:59 PM
sorry, truth is more detailed than misinformation. (the person "H" may not be intending to tell lies, and might be misinformed himself/herself). Senate Republicans have been blocking two major energy bills - one to curb speculation, and the other to provide continuing tax incentives, which will otherwise expire in December, for development of wind, solar, geo-thermal alternatives. We are not a long way from having enough energy from these sources. But big oil and nuclear energy are subsidized steadily, and the tax breaks for "green" sources are constantly threatened by Republicans. That threat is used as a "bargaining chip" to try to force Democrats to support more nuclear, coal, and oil and gas tax breaks. It worked on the last energy bill, and Democrats had to accept big long-term benefits for oil interests, in order to get small, short-term benefits for solar and wind, etc. Senate Republicans also refuse to allow a bill to pass to help poor people to pay heat & cooling bills.

Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 6, 2008 at 06:46 PM
the big oil companies want to make their move to get rights to grab the leases on all these new land and off-shore sites, while there are two men in the White House to approve of their greedy grab of more rights to drill, and before there are enough Democrats to block them (they are trying to get the public to pressure moderate and Southern Democrats to go along with this scheme, just before the election, by spreading false information and fooling the public about their intentions and about the facts. They intend to get more leases to hold on to. There is no requirement that they either drill in the new areas, or that they sell oil from these or other areras, in the United States. They could export it. Of course some of this land and off-shore area that they have designs on is in fragile territory; that's why it was off-limits in the first place! There were dangerous oil spills, and ordinary people who want clean beaches opposed taking the risk. Check the facts!

Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 6, 2008 at 06:40 PM
sorry, but I can't allow false statements to go unchallenged. It is not the Democratic Party that is putting a hold on drilling. Democrats in the House are insisting that there be a "use it or lose it" policy so that oil companies are forced to drill in areas where they already hold the leases and where the environmental impact statement has approved the drilling, and oil reserves are located. It is the big oil corporations that are not drilling. They just want to hold on to the rights to drill, and not drill, which forces the price of oil up. This is factual, and can be checked. The Republicans, particularly in the House, are trying to mislead the American people to put presure on Congress to approve awarding of more leases for drilling to the big oil companies that are contributing big bucks to the GOP, and to McCain now that he has changed his position on more leases and drilling. He changed his views recently, and the oil $ came pouring in to his campaign afterwards.

Posted by: Dan Location: Lincoln on Aug 6, 2008 at 01:57 PM
GO KLEEB!!

Posted by: Andrew Location: Lincoln on Aug 6, 2008 at 10:39 AM
I'm glad Kleeb doesn't stand a chance.

Posted by: H Location: Lincoln on Aug 6, 2008 at 10:06 AM
I am glad to see a democrat open to drilling and nuclear. However he needs to look at his own party to reform. It is the democratic party that is putting the hold on drilling. And it is the democratic party that has put the hold on nuclear. Extreme enviromentalists in the democratic party are the ones that are not allowing drilling and the development of new nuclear facilities. As for other renewable energy such as solar and wind, we are no where near having them as a cheap efficient alternative. I am all for development of these because they would be a free renewable source, however it will not happen in the near future so for the time being, we need to drill and invest in nuclear to help our energy needs, not submit to the extreme enviromentalist left and change our entire way of living.

Posted by: ash Location: lincoln on Aug 6, 2008 at 02:08 AM
Kleeb you have my VOTE! I can't take anymore of Johanns Lies,like his past record has been based on.

Posted by: lynnette Location: iowa on Aug 5, 2008 at 06:32 PM
Kleeb will do well to campaign hard in the Omaha area, along with the Congressional candidate, and the organizers for Obama's campaign, since Nebraska divides its electoral votes by Congressional District, and every Congressional gain is important. If Kleeb doesn't win, it will not be his fault. He should have a wonderful future, using all his intellegence and talents and education and values and background. His value is as a person, not in what title he holds. He could do any one of many useful jobs to make this a better country, or a better world. I think he can do it best by being true to himself, and seeing what opportunities come to him. If Chuck Hagel is too good for the U. S. Senate (and I think he has risen beyond it, in his understanding of the world situation), then Kleeb in his way can also be very good. He needs to earn the respect of the wisest people in the U. S., who would appoint him to a national position where he can contribute most, where polls don't count!

Car Soup
What's On KOLN/KGIN